快速访问
文章信息
参考文献
[1]BATTILANA, J, LEE, M. 2014. Advancing research on hybrid organizing—insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Manag. Ann., 8(1), 397-441.
[2]PHILLS, J A, DEIGLMEIER, K, MILLER, D T. 2008. Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev., 6(4), 34-43.
[3]CAJAIBA-SANTANA, G. 2014. Social innovation: moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 82, 42-51.
[4]PACHE, A C, SANTOS, F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Manag. J., 56(4), 972-1001.
[5]DOHERTY, B, HAUGH, H, LYON, F. 2014. Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev., 16(4), 417-436.
[6]BESHAROV, M L, SMITH, W K. 2014. Multiple institutional logics in organizations: explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Manag. Rev., 39(3), 364-381.
[7]THORNTON, P H, OCASIO, W, LOUNSBURY, M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford University Press.
[8]SMITH, W K, LEWIS, M W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Manag. Rev., 36(2), 381-403.
[9]DIONISIO, M, DE VARGAS, E R. 2020. Corporate social innovation: a systematic literature review. Int. Bus. Rev., 29(2), 101641.
[10]TABARES, S, DIONISIO, M, PARIDA, V. 2025. Leveraging corporate social innovation by hybrid organizations: a strategic perspective from B Corps in Latin America. J. Bus. Res., 186, 114945.
[11]HUBER, G P. 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci., 2(1), 88-115.
版权与开放获取声明
作为一本开放获取的学术期刊，所有文章均遵循 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) 协议发布，允许用户在署名原作者的前提下自由共享与再利用内容。所有文章均可免费供读者和机构阅读、下载、引用与传播，EWA Publishing 不会通过期刊的出版发行向读者或机构收取任何费用。